Inteligência Artificial

AI influencers are ‘everywhere’ at Coachella

Publicado porRedacao AIDaily
6 min de leitura
Autor na fonte original: Jess Weatherbed

Coachella kicked off on Friday, and as usual, it's the place to be for online influencers looking to show off their memorable experiences at the festival. A quick scroll through my social media feeds has already shown me many uncannily attractive figures in glitzy outfits, posing for perfectly staged photographs with celebrities. Only some of […]

Compartilhar:

Can you live vicariously through content creators if they’re not actually alive?

Can you live vicariously through content creators if they’re not actually alive?

Coachella kicked off on Friday, and as usual, it’s the place to be for online influencers looking to show off their memorable experiences at the festival. A quick scroll through my social media feeds has already shown me many uncannily attractive figures in glitzy outfits, posing for perfectly staged photographs with celebrities.

Only some of these content creators aren’t really there. They don’t even exist at all outside of our screens. They’re generated using AI tools.

Faking Coachella attendance is nothing new — even real influencers have been doing so in recent years — but generative AI has now progressed to the point where it’s become much harder to pick these synthetic creators out amid the flood of real festival attendees. Some make little effort to hide that the “faces” of such social media accounts are entirely synthetic, tagging their bios and posts with disclosures that proudly identify the page’s personas as so-called “digital creators,” a term that obscures whether the person is AI or simply online. Others I can identify just by using my eyeballs, no disclosures needed.

Ammarathegoat is most likely one such AI influencer trying to sell a false reality to its over 170,000 Instagram followers. Images posted by the account, which has no AI disclosure in the bio, show what looks like an AI-generated avatar posing for pictures with members of the Kardashian/Jenner family and real human content creators like Bretman Rock and James Charles, all with recognizable scenes of Coachella structures in the background. There’s no AI information available from Meta or the creator on any of these posts, but the visual distortions on images and videos (both current and older examples ) strongly suggest that Ammarathegoat is AI-generated.

Another Instagram account posting Coachella snaps with the Kardashians/Jenners is Grannyspills, an avatar made with Higgsfield AI according to the creator bio, that’s amassed more than 2 million followers. Like Ammarathegoat, video content posted by Grannyspills moves unnaturally, and images carry other signature AI tells, like being too polished or depicting the avatar with inconsistent body shapes. While the account is also labeled as a “digital creator,” none of the images or videos it’s posted include a clear disclosure beyond an “AI info” tag hidden under the three-dot menu on Instagram’s mobile app. On the desktop version, I can’t see any AI labels at all.

A pattern I’ve observed is that accounts running female-presenting AI avatars like to avoid mentioning that the unnaturally beautiful women you’re seeing aren’t real. A notable exception is Lil Miquela, one of the biggest AI influencers to date, which notably “interviewed” J Balvin for Coachella in 2019, and is back “at” the festival again this year . Meanwhile, Miazelu and Anazelu — two other Instagram accounts with 252,000 and 312,000 followers, respectively — have posted pictures together that are near indistinguishable from those of actual festivalgoers, with casual shots showing believable backgrounds that depict the event. Both accounts describe themselves as AI influencers in their bio, but omit that information across every image or video they’ve published.

It’s easy to understand why these accounts, and many others with fewer followers, are pretending to attend Coachella. California’s festival has already been described as the “Influencer Olympics,” in which content creators compete against each other to secure brand sponsorships and agency representation or simply grow their audiences of remote spectators. Including famous faces in such posts is likely a tactic to increase the reach of these accounts, or to prey on existing fan bases for those actual celebrities.

That potential audience boost also applies to social media accounts that offer more sexualized services on other platforms. One Instagram account that links to an OnlyFans page has posted two images of themself with Coachella headliner Justin Bieber, supposedly taken during the festival. I can’t verify if this is a real person as, again, there are no AI disclosures on the account, but these images may appear to other Instagram users who search for what Bieber was doing during the event.

Many people in the comments can’t tell either. “Does Hailey know about this! Yikes,” replied one commenter. “idk! They weren’t together at the time,” the account responded. This is either more ammunition for the Dead Internet theory , or people are more gullible than I assumed.

Nikki Bellini, an adult-themed AI influencer that directs social media followers to subscribe to its Fanvue account — an OnlyFans-like service that appears friendlier to AI content — made a stir last year after its creator reportedly received “hundreds” of invitations to meet up at Coachella in person.

This year other AI-generated “Fanvue Ambassadors” like Fit_aitana have jumped on the trend, showing convincing festival fakery to its almost 400,000 Instagram followers. Fit_aitana describes itself as a “virtual soul” rather than an AI avatar, but it’s still fake, which is rarely disclosed on any content posted to the account. A cursory look on X also reveals that Ammarathegoat has an OnlyFans account, a platform that doesn’t explicitly ban AI-generated content, but requires creators to verify their identity. That profile, too, lacks any AI disclosures.

Instagram users either haven’t noticed or just don’t care. “Looks like you had the absolute best time ❤️,” one commenter said on Fit_aitana’s Coachella post. “jealous = me.”

Even when there are no external services to link to, AI-generated boobs have been plastered across Coachella hashtags on Instagram with no disclosures, though sometimes the number of boobs is a giveaway.

I’ve found that male-presenting AI influencers are more inclined to disclose that they’re not real humans, but only because they want to sell you something else: the means to make your own AI mimics. They’re pitching prompting guides and AI content systems that users can buy to create their own fake influencers or utilize premade avatars using flashy Coachella visuals.

Any influencer coverage of a pop culture event can feel performative these days given the chance to monetize any such opportunities, but the involvement of fake influencers, with no clear disclosures, feels like it’s taking advantage of people who are unable to attend events like Coachella in person. Now we can’t even reliably enjoy the event from afar without questioning how much of what we’re seeing is actually taking place. And now that some of these synthetic creators have reached internet micro-celebrity status, it seems likely the trend will continue.

Brands are already reportedly spending “ into the high six figures ” to send real human creators to Coachella — I imagine that investing in false realities may be far cheaper, in every sense of the word. If brands are interested in splashing sponsorship deals across AI-generated faces, they may not be bothered about such fakery being disclosed to their potential consumers. Perhaps those consumers won’t notice, or even care.

Xbox Game Pass ‘has become too expensive,’ says Microsoft’s new gaming chief in leaked memo

Mark Zuckerberg is reportedly building an AI clone to replace him in meetings

Huawei beats Apple and Samsung with new wide foldable

Sam Altman reportedly targeted in second attack

Read OpenAI’s latest internal memo about beating the competition — including Anthropic

Pontos-chave

  • A presença de influenciadores digitais gerados por IA pode gerar desconfiança entre os consumidores, especialmente os jovens.
  • A democratização do acesso a influenciadores pode beneficiar marcas menores, mas levanta questões éticas sobre transparência.
  • A indústria de marketing precisará estabelecer diretrizes claras sobre a divulgação de conteúdos gerados por IA.

Análise editorial

A presença de influenciadores gerados por IA em eventos como o Coachella levanta questões importantes sobre a autenticidade e a percepção do público em relação ao conteúdo digital. No Brasil, onde a cultura de influenciadores digitais está em plena expansão, essa tendência pode impactar a forma como marcas e consumidores interagem. A capacidade de criar avatares hiper-realistas que se misturam com influenciadores reais pode gerar desconfiança e confusão, especialmente entre os jovens, que são os principais consumidores de conteúdo nas redes sociais.

Além disso, a utilização de IA para criar personalidades digitais pode democratizar o acesso a influenciadores, permitindo que marcas menores ou novos criadores de conteúdo se destaquem sem a necessidade de uma presença física. No entanto, isso também levanta questões éticas sobre a transparência e a responsabilidade dos criadores de conteúdo, uma vez que a linha entre o real e o artificial se torna cada vez mais tênue.

O fenômeno dos influenciadores digitais gerados por IA também pode ter implicações significativas para a indústria de marketing e publicidade. À medida que mais marcas adotam essas tecnologias, será crucial estabelecer diretrizes claras sobre a divulgação de conteúdos gerados por IA. O público deve ser informado sobre a natureza do conteúdo que consome, e as plataformas sociais podem precisar implementar políticas mais rigorosas para garantir a transparência.

Por fim, é importante observar como essa tendência evolui e se estabelece no Brasil. Com o crescimento das ferramentas de IA e a popularização de avatares digitais, o cenário de influenciadores pode mudar drasticamente nos próximos anos. O que será crucial é como o público e as marcas responderão a essa nova realidade e a forma como a ética digital será discutida e aplicada nesse contexto.

O que esta cobertura entrega

  • Atribuicao clara de fonte com link para a publicacao original.
  • Enquadramento editorial sobre relevancia, impacto e proximos desdobramentos.
  • Revisao de legibilidade, contexto e duplicacao antes da publicacao.

Fonte original:

The Verge AI

Sobre este artigo

Este artigo foi curado e publicado pelo AIDaily como parte da nossa cobertura editorial sobre desenvolvimentos em inteligência artificial. O conteúdo é baseado na fonte original citada abaixo, enriquecido com contexto e análise editorial. Ferramentas automatizadas podem auxiliar tradução e estruturação inicial, mas a decisão de publicar, a revisão factual e o enquadramento de contexto seguem responsabilidade editorial.

Saiba mais sobre nosso processo editorial