Apple says more ex-employees may have taken confidential data to OpenAI
Apple says its trade secrets investigation into OpenAI has widened. In a new court filing, Apple claims additional former staff may have retained or accessed confidential information.
Apple is now seeking a preliminary injunction in its trade secrets case against OpenAI, which aims to stop the AI model maker from moving forward with developing an AI device or other products based on Apple’s technology. The iPhone maker also claims that more of its former employees may be involved with the trade secrets theft.
In a new filing , Apple is requesting expedited discovery from the accused OpenAI employees, senior systems engineer Chang Liu and Chief Hardware Officer Tang Yew Tan; OpenAI, and its foundation; and io, the device startup co-founded by Apple’s former lead designer Jony Ive.
Apple also notes that its continued investigation has so far revealed 11 other former Apple employees beyond Liu and Tan may have been witnesses or otherwise involved in the case, and others who were previously named in the original complaint, like OpenAI employee Yu-Ting Peng.
The filing marks an escalation in Apple’s legal battle with OpenAI, as it suggests Apple has uncovered new evidence that the misconduct goes beyond the former employees named in the original complaint.
“For example, another former Apple employee seems to have met with Mr. Liu and Ms. Peng in advance of Ms. Peng’s interview at OpenAI and discussed with them during that meeting Apple proprietary information relating to unannounced products,” the filing states. “Yet another former Apple employee took screenshots of confidential Apple documents relating to an unannounced Apple product before an interview at OpenAI.”
“And, after Apple filed its complaint, multiple former Apple employees now working at OpenAI reached out to discuss returning Apple-issued work devices they kept when they left Apple,” Apple claims, suggesting there were more who were possibly involved with the scheme.
Apple is pushing the court to allow for expedited discovery because it believes it has good cause to suspect that there are others involved in the theft of its intellectual property. The company noted that its motion for a preliminary injunction is also pending.
OpenAI responded publicly to Apple’s latest, saying in a blog post that Apple’s request for a preliminary injunction is “both based on false information and completely unnecessary because we do not have, nor want, any of their trade secrets.”
“We’re much more interested in building innovative products and technologies that push the frontier,” OpenAI’s statement reads.
The AI model maker also pointed to earlier mistakes Apple made, which had been reported, including that Apple emailed the wrong person when it made contact with OpenAI after confusing two similar surnames. OpenAI also alleges that Apple lied about discussing matters with its general counsel. And, the company said that Apple didn’t admit to the claim that the “residual access” allowing former employees to access Apple’s system was the result of poor security procedures on Apple’s part.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Scale faster. Grow your portfolio. Gain practical expertise. No matter your goal, Disrupt can empower you. Save up to $330 toda y!
Influencers draw backlash for attending OpenAI’s first luxury trip Dominic-Madori Davis
Influencers draw backlash for attending OpenAI’s first luxury trip
Influencers draw backlash for attending OpenAI’s first luxury trip
Sequoia’s Shaun Maguire leads $1B round for nuclear startup Valar Atomics Julie Bort
Sequoia’s Shaun Maguire leads $1B round for nuclear startup Valar Atomics
Sequoia’s Shaun Maguire leads $1B round for nuclear startup Valar Atomics
YouTuber Hank Green says his AI usage is ‘not healthy’ Anthony Ha
YouTuber Hank Green says his AI usage is ‘not healthy’
YouTuber Hank Green says his AI usage is ‘not healthy’
WhatsApp is testing a new folder for messages from large businesses Ivan Mehta
WhatsApp is testing a new folder for messages from large businesses
WhatsApp is testing a new folder for messages from large businesses
Spotify adds a running mode to its app Ivan Mehta
Claude Opus 5 became downright ruthless when tasked with running a vending machine Julie Bort
Claude Opus 5 became downright ruthless when tasked with running a vending machine
Claude Opus 5 became downright ruthless when tasked with running a vending machine
DoorDash is building its own drone delivery business Kirsten Korosec
DoorDash is building its own drone delivery business
DoorDash is building its own drone delivery business
Pontos-chave
- A disputa entre Apple e OpenAI destaca a importância da proteção de propriedade intelectual no setor de tecnologia.
- A resposta da OpenAI sugere um foco em inovação, mas levanta questões sobre ética e transparência.
- O desdobramento do caso pode estabelecer precedentes que afetarão a movimentação de talentos e a colaboração entre empresas.
Análise editorial
A ampliação da investigação da Apple sobre a OpenAI destaca a crescente preocupação com a proteção de propriedade intelectual no setor de tecnologia, especialmente em um momento em que a IA está se tornando um dos pilares da inovação. Para o Brasil, onde o ecossistema de startups de tecnologia está em expansão, essa situação serve como um alerta sobre a importância de salvaguardar informações sensíveis e a necessidade de políticas robustas de compliance. A troca de talentos entre grandes empresas e startups, embora benéfica para a inovação, pode também acarretar riscos significativos se não houver um controle adequado sobre o que é compartilhado e retido por ex-funcionários.
Além disso, a resposta da OpenAI, que nega a posse de segredos comerciais da Apple, levanta questões sobre a transparência e a ética no desenvolvimento de tecnologias emergentes. O fato de que a OpenAI se posiciona como uma empresa focada em inovação, sem interesse em segredos de concorrentes, pode ser visto como uma tentativa de mitigar danos à sua reputação, mas também nos faz questionar como as empresas estão gerenciando a transferência de conhecimento e a colaboração em um ambiente tão competitivo.
O desdobramento desse caso pode influenciar a forma como as empresas de tecnologia, tanto no Brasil quanto globalmente, abordam a questão da propriedade intelectual. Espera-se que as decisões judiciais resultantes desta disputa estabeleçam precedentes que moldarão as práticas de mercado e a relação entre ex-funcionários e novas startups. A atenção do setor deve estar voltada para como as cortes interpretarão as alegações de Apple e OpenAI, pois isso pode impactar a confiança em colaborações futuras entre empresas e a movimentação de talentos na indústria.
Por fim, a situação ressalta a necessidade de um diálogo contínuo sobre ética e responsabilidade no uso de dados e informações confidenciais. À medida que mais empresas de tecnologia, incluindo startups brasileiras, buscam se posicionar no mercado global, a proteção de suas inovações e segredos comerciais se tornará cada vez mais crucial. O que está em jogo aqui não é apenas a reputação de empresas individuais, mas a integridade de todo o ecossistema tecnológico, que depende da confiança mútua entre seus participantes.
O que esta cobertura entrega
- Atribuicao clara de fonte com link para a publicacao original.
- Enquadramento editorial sobre relevancia, impacto e proximos desdobramentos.
- Revisao de legibilidade, contexto e duplicacao antes da publicacao.
Fonte original:
TechCrunch AISobre este artigo
Este artigo foi curado e publicado pelo AIDaily como parte da nossa cobertura editorial sobre desenvolvimentos em inteligência artificial. O conteúdo é baseado na fonte original citada abaixo, enriquecido com contexto e análise editorial. Ferramentas automatizadas podem auxiliar tradução e estruturação inicial, mas a decisão de publicar, a revisão factual e o enquadramento de contexto seguem responsabilidade editorial.
Saiba mais sobre nosso processo editorial