Elizabeth Warren calls Pentagon’s decision to bar Anthropic ‘retaliation’
In a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) equated the DoD's decision to label Anthropic a "supply chain risk" as retaliation, arguing that the Pentagon could simply have terminated its contract with the AI lab.
Anthropic is attracting an increasing number of supporters in its fight against the U.S. Department of Defense, which last month designated the AI lab as a supply-chain risk after it refused to make concessions on how its AI could be used by the military.
In a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) equated the DoD’s decision with “retaliation,” arguing that the Pentagon could simply have terminated its contract with the AI lab, CNBC reports .
“I am particularly concerned that the DoD is trying to strong-arm American companies into providing the Department with the tools to spy on American citizens and deploy fully autonomous weapons without adequate safeguards,” Warren wrote, per the report, adding that the barring of Anthropic “appears to be retaliation.”
Warren’s words echo many other organizations that have spoken out against the Defense Department’s treatment of Anthropic. Several tech companies and employees — including from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft — as well as legal rights groups, have filed amicus briefs in support of Anthropic and denouncing the designation, which is usually applied to foreign adversaries and not U.S. firms.
The dispute arose after Anthropic told the Pentagon that it did not want its AI systems to be used for mass surveillance of Americans, and that the technology wasn’t ready for use in targeting or firing decisions of lethal autonomous weapons without human intervention. The Pentagon contested that a private company shouldn’t dictate how the military uses technology, and soon after designated the company as a “supply-chain risk.” The label requires any company or agency that does work with the Pentagon to certify that it doesn’t use the designated company’s products or services — effectively barring the company from work with any company that also works with the U.S. government.
The letter from Warren comes a day before a hearing in San Francisco on Tuesday, when District Judge Rita Lin will decide whether to grant Anthropic a preliminary injunction that seeks to preserve the status quo while its case against the DoD is litigated.
While Anthropic is suing the DOD of infringing on its First Amendment rights and punishing the company based on ideological grounds, the Defense Department has maintained that Anthropic’s refusal to allow all lawful military uses of its technology was a business decision, not protected speech, and that the designation was a straightforward national security call and not punishment for the company’s views.
Disrupt 2026: The tech ecosystem, all in one room
Save up to $300 or 30% to TechCrunch Founder Summit
The AI lab last week submitted two declarations to the court that claim the government’s logic is flawed as they depend on technical misunderstandings as well as points of concern that were not raised during the company’s negotiations with the DoD.
Warren has also written to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, asking for details of the company’s agreement with the DoD , which came just a day after the Pentagon blacklisted Anthropic.
Anthropic and the Defense Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Ram is a financial and tech reporter and editor. He covered North American and European M&A, equity, regulatory news and debt markets at Reuters and Acuris Global, and has also written about travel, tourism, entertainment and books.
You can contact or verify outreach from Ram by emailing ram.iyer@techcrunch.com .
Actively scaling? Fundraising? Planning your next launch? TechCrunch Founder Summit 2026 delivers tactical playbooks and direct access to 1,000+ founders and investors who are building, backing, and closing.
Delve accused of misleading customers with ‘fake compliance’ Anthony Ha
Delve accused of misleading customers with ‘fake compliance’
Delve accused of misleading customers with ‘fake compliance’
Cyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the US Zack Whittaker
Cyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the US
Cyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the US
Jeff Bezos reportedly wants $100 billion to buy and transform old manufacturing firms with AI Lucas Ropek
Jeff Bezos reportedly wants $100 billion to buy and transform old manufacturing firms with AI
Jeff Bezos reportedly wants $100 billion to buy and transform old manufacturing firms with AI
Employees had to restrain a dancing humanoid robot after it went wild at a California restaurant Amanda Silberling
Employees had to restrain a dancing humanoid robot after it went wild at a California restaurant
Employees had to restrain a dancing humanoid robot after it went wild at a California restaurant
Nothing CEO Carl Pei says smartphone apps will disappear as AI agents take their place Sarah Perez
Nothing CEO Carl Pei says smartphone apps will disappear as AI agents take their place
Nothing CEO Carl Pei says smartphone apps will disappear as AI agents take their place
Nvidia is quietly building a multibillion-dollar behemoth to rival its chips business Rebecca Szkutak
Nvidia is quietly building a multibillion-dollar behemoth to rival its chips business
Nvidia is quietly building a multibillion-dollar behemoth to rival its chips business
Why Garry Tan’s Claude Code setup has gotten so much love, and hate Julie Bort
Why Garry Tan’s Claude Code setup has gotten so much love, and hate
Why Garry Tan’s Claude Code setup has gotten so much love, and hate
O que esta cobertura entrega
- Atribuicao clara de fonte com link para a publicacao original.
- Enquadramento editorial sobre relevancia, impacto e proximos desdobramentos.
- Revisao de legibilidade, contexto e duplicacao antes da publicacao.
Fonte original:
TechCrunch AISobre este artigo
Este artigo foi curado e publicado pelo AIDaily como parte da nossa cobertura editorial sobre desenvolvimentos em inteligência artificial. O conteúdo é baseado na fonte original citada abaixo, enriquecido com contexto e análise editorial. Ferramentas automatizadas podem auxiliar tradução e estruturação inicial, mas a decisão de publicar, a revisão factual e o enquadramento de contexto seguem responsabilidade editorial.
Saiba mais sobre nosso processo editorial