Segurança Cibernética

Microsoft is openly competing with OpenAI, Anthropic more than ever

Publicado porRedacao AIDaily
5 min de leitura
Autor na fonte original: Julie Bort

Microsoft pitched its own homegrown AI models, harnesses, and even a Mythos competitor on Wednesday, telling Wall Street it plans for continued growth.

Compartilhar:

Microsoft is in a unique position as AI overtakes the tech industry. It’s one of the world’s largest cloud providers and software-as-a-service companies, while also holding valuable stakes in the two biggest AI labs , OpenAI and Anthropic.

Those incentives are starting to clash as Microsoft posts blockbuster financial results. The company just reported an extremely profitable quarter with $90 billion in revenue and net income of $35.8 billion. For the fiscal year, which ended June 30, Microsoft reported $331.8 billion in revenue with a net income of $133.7 billion for the year.

And CEO Satya Nadella is not about to let the trajectory of Anthropic and OpenAI — which are expanding into applications and agentic infrastructure that could ultimately let them own customer relationships — derail that kind of cash.

Nadella has been preaching to enterprises to use multiple models and to stop relying on the frontier AI labs for the agentic harness/app layer.

Doing so is dangerous, he’s been saying, because it requires companies to share too many of their internal secrets with model makers of dubious trustworthiness. He knows his customers. Enterprise IT fears both data leaks and being locked into a vendor.

Now he has openly told Wall Street analysts during the company’s quarterly conference call Wednesday that this is an opportunity for Microsoft to sell customers its own homegrown models, alongside agents, AI security and more, while promising lower costs.

In other words, he’s pitching Microsoft as an alternative to many of the upscale services that OpenAI and Anthropic are developing for their own growth.

When UBS analyst Karl Keirstead specifically asked Nadella to weigh in on the open vs. closed-sourced debate roiling the AI industry, and how Microsoft will benefit from it, Nadella came out swinging.

“The goal is to have the firm be in control of their own destiny,” the CEO said of enterprises. “We are very, very clear about the architectural sort of design of the platform, which is you got to keep your harness separate from the model … that means any model at any given time is swappable.”

Microsoft, of course, sells a menu of harnesses (aka AI agents), too, under the Copilot name, including its coding agent GitHub Copilot. Coding agents are where much of the AI dollars are being spent today .

And he used the high-profile incident from last week as proof of his warnings.

“If you look even at the Hugging Face incident, the biggest thing that we should take away from that is you can’t sort of depend on any one model,” Nadella said. “You will maybe need multiple models to even remediate some challenges that get caused by one model. Like that’s the way to think about it, right? Which is you can’t be subject to a refusal of one model.”

The incident involved an unreleased model from OpenAI breaking out of its sandbox and successfully mounting a full-scale hack on Hugging Face , all in pursuit of besting a benchmark. Trying to understand what happened, Hugging Face at first tried to use a private frontier model (which it hasn’t named) that refused to help it. So it turned to the Chinese open-source model Z.ai GLM 5.2 to analyze logs and defend its infrastructure. The incident has so shocked the industry that even Sam Altman is now saying that maybe AI development should slow down a bit.

Nadella also made clear that Microsoft is happily selling its own homegrown models, the MAI family, on its own homegrown AI chips, Maya, and pitching them as cheaper alternatives.

“Every customer wants the right model for each task based on quality, latency, cost, and compliance. We offer the broadest model catalog in the cloud with over 11,000 models, including the leads from OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, xAI, as well as our own MAI family,” he said.

He added: “We’re also accelerating our own model development. We announced more than a dozen new models across image, voice, transcription, coding, security, including our first reasoning model, MAI thinking one, all with cost-efficient inference at the core for the enterprise use cases. We are co-designing these models with our silicon, and we are seeing 40% better performance per watt when running MAI models on Maya 200.”

As for Mythos? Nadella pointed to Microsoft’s new Mythos competitor announced earlier this week, MAI Cyber One Flash. It “achieves better performance than the much larger Mythos model, but at half the cost when combined with our multi-agent security harness,” he said.

Sure, the Microsoft CEO says that enterprises should use the frontier models that OpenAI and Anthropic offer in their mix. But his bigger message is: don’t trust them enough to rely on them.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Scale faster. Grow your portfolio. Gain practical expertise. No matter your goal, Disrupt can empower you. Save up to $330 toda y!

Sam Altman is ready to decelerate Tim Fernholz

Kalshi demands Netflix take down trailer for ‘Prediction Games’ documentary Anthony Ha

Kalshi demands Netflix take down trailer for ‘Prediction Games’ documentary

Kalshi demands Netflix take down trailer for ‘Prediction Games’ documentary

Librarians are hosting viral ‘Avoiding AI’ workshops for people who are fed up with Big Tech Amanda Silberling

Librarians are hosting viral ‘Avoiding AI’ workshops for people who are fed up with Big Tech

Librarians are hosting viral ‘Avoiding AI’ workshops for people who are fed up with Big Tech

SpaceX launches new V3 Starlink satellites but suffers another booster failure Sean O'Kane

SpaceX launches new V3 Starlink satellites but suffers another booster failure

SpaceX launches new V3 Starlink satellites but suffers another booster failure

Prentis, new AI lab co-founded by Reid Hoffman, Mark Pincus in talks to raise $100M Marina Temkin

Prentis, new AI lab co-founded by Reid Hoffman, Mark Pincus in talks to raise $100M

Prentis, new AI lab co-founded by Reid Hoffman, Mark Pincus in talks to raise $100M

US accuses American of allegedly wiping his phone using a ‘duress’ password during border search Zack Whittaker

US accuses American of allegedly wiping his phone using a ‘duress’ password during border search

US accuses American of allegedly wiping his phone using a ‘duress’ password during border search

Anduril reportedly in talks to raise funding at $100B valuation, more than 3x last year’s mark Ram Iyer

Anduril reportedly in talks to raise funding at $100B valuation, more than 3x last year’s mark

Anduril reportedly in talks to raise funding at $100B valuation, more than 3x last year’s mark

Pontos-chave

  • A Microsoft está se posicionando como uma alternativa viável às soluções de IA da OpenAI e Anthropic, promovendo modelos próprios e segurança.
  • A flexibilidade na troca de modelos de IA pode incentivar a inovação entre startups e empresas brasileiras, criando um ambiente competitivo.
  • A crescente rivalidade no setor pode levar a uma demanda por regulamentações mais rigorosas sobre ética e uso responsável de IA.

Análise editorial

A movimentação da Microsoft em relação à OpenAI e Anthropic sinaliza um ponto de inflexão significativo no setor de tecnologia, especialmente para o Brasil, onde a adoção de soluções de IA está crescendo rapidamente. A estratégia da Microsoft de promover seus próprios modelos de IA e serviços de segurança pode influenciar a forma como as empresas brasileiras abordam a integração de IA em suas operações. Com o receio de vazamentos de dados e a dependência excessiva de fornecedores externos, as empresas locais podem se sentir mais inclinadas a explorar soluções internas ou híbridas, alinhando-se com a visão de Satya Nadella sobre controle e autonomia.

Além disso, a ênfase da Microsoft em um ecossistema de IA que permite a troca de modelos pode incentivar a inovação no Brasil. Startups e empresas de tecnologia podem se beneficiar ao desenvolver soluções que se integrem a essa flexibilidade, criando um ambiente mais dinâmico e competitivo. A capacidade de personalizar e adaptar modelos de IA pode ser um diferencial importante para empresas que buscam atender a necessidades específicas do mercado brasileiro.

Por outro lado, a rivalidade crescente entre gigantes da tecnologia pode levar a um aumento na pressão por regulamentações e práticas éticas em IA. À medida que mais empresas buscam adotar IA, a necessidade de diretrizes claras sobre privacidade de dados e uso responsável da tecnologia se torna mais urgente. O Brasil, com sua legislação de proteção de dados, pode desempenhar um papel crucial na definição de padrões que equilibrem inovação e responsabilidade.

O que observar a seguir é como a Microsoft e outras empresas se posicionarão em relação às demandas do mercado brasileiro. A adoção de modelos de IA deve ser acompanhada de um diálogo contínuo sobre ética e segurança, especialmente em um ambiente onde a confiança do consumidor é fundamental. As empresas que conseguirem alinhar inovação com responsabilidade terão uma vantagem competitiva significativa no futuro próximo.

O que esta cobertura entrega

  • Atribuicao clara de fonte com link para a publicacao original.
  • Enquadramento editorial sobre relevancia, impacto e proximos desdobramentos.
  • Revisao de legibilidade, contexto e duplicacao antes da publicacao.

Fonte original:

TechCrunch AI

Sobre este artigo

Este artigo foi curado e publicado pelo AIDaily como parte da nossa cobertura editorial sobre desenvolvimentos em inteligência artificial. O conteúdo é baseado na fonte original citada abaixo, enriquecido com contexto e análise editorial. Ferramentas automatizadas podem auxiliar tradução e estruturação inicial, mas a decisão de publicar, a revisão factual e o enquadramento de contexto seguem responsabilidade editorial.

Saiba mais sobre nosso processo editorial