Musk mulled handing OpenAI to his children, Altman testifies
Altman said that Musk's focus on controlling the initial for-profit gave him pause because OpenAI was dedicated to keeping advanced AI out of the hands of a single person, and Altman, with his experience running the prominent startup accelerator Y Combinator, knew "founders who had control usually did not give it up."
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman finally took the stand this morning to defend himself against his former co-founder Elon Musk’s lawsuit challenging OpenAI’s corporate structure.
Altman was immediately asked what he thought of Musk’s allegation that OpenAI’s other founders “stole a charity” when they launched a for-profit subsidiary to market products based on the company’s AI models.
“It feels difficult to even wrap my head around that framing,” Altman said after several seconds of silence. “We created one of the largest charities in the world. This foundation is doing incredible work and will do much more.”
Musk’s attorneys have been at pains to point out that OpenAI’s foundation, which now has assets on the order of $200 billion, didn’t have full-time employees until earlier this year. OpenAI board chair Bret Taylor testified today that was simply because of the challenge of converting OpenAI equity to cash, which was accomplished with the organization’s most recent restructuring in 2025.
The central question posed by Musk’s lawyers is whether the company’s commitment to safety had been left behind as its commercial power grew. But Altman said that in 2017, during a pivotal period when the founders wrestled with how to obtain the funding to power their AI models, Musk’s “specific plans on safety made me worry.”
He described a “particularly hair-raising moment” in the debate when Musk was asked what would happen if he died while controlling a hypothetical OpenAI for-profit. In Altman’s telling, Musk said, “Maybe OpenAI should pass to my children.”
Altman said that Musk’s focus on controlling the initial for-profit gave him pause because OpenAI was dedicated to keeping advanced AI out of the hands of a single person, and Altman, with his experience running the prominent startup accelerator Y Combinator, knew “founders who had control usually did not give it up.”
Altman also testified that Musk's management tactics, which might have worked for engineering and manufacturing, didn't work at OpenAI.
"I don't think Mr. Musk understood how to run a good research lab," Altman said. "He had demotivated some of our most key researchers. He had at one point required Greg and Ilya to make a list of the researchers and list out their accomplishments and stack rank them and take a chainsaw through a bunch. That did huge damage for a long time to the culture of the organization."
Indeed, Altman cast himself as defending the "sweat equity" of fellow co-founders Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever, the two people effectively running OpenAI at the time while Musk and Altman had other jobs.
After that clash went unresolved, Musk ultimately left OpenAI's board and started competing AI initiatives at Tesla and his own AI startup, xAI. But Altman kept in touch with the mercurial businessman, updating him on OpenAI's work and seeking his funding and advice.
OpenAI's lawyers noted that Musk had been kept up to date and asked to participate in the investments that his lawsuits now claim corrupted the non-profit.
During one discussion of a Microsoft investment into OpenAI in 2018, Altman said that "unlike a lot of meetings with Mr. Musk, this was a good vibes meeting," where Musk spent a "long conversation showing us memes on his phone."
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
StrictlyVC Athens is up next. Hear unfiltered insights straight from Europe’s tech leaders and connect with the people shaping what’s ahead. Lock in your spot before it’s gone.
Fintech startup Parker files for bankruptcy Anthony Ha
Fintech startup Parker files for bankruptcy
Fintech startup Parker files for bankruptcy
Laid-off Oracle workers tried to negotiate better severance. Oracle said no. Julie Bort
Laid-off Oracle workers tried to negotiate better severance. Oracle said no.
Laid-off Oracle workers tried to negotiate better severance. Oracle said no.
San Francisco’s housing market has lost its mind Connie Loizos
San Francisco’s housing market has lost its mind
San Francisco’s housing market has lost its mind
US defense contractor who sold hacking tools to Russian broker ordered to pay $10M to former employers Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai
US defense contractor who sold hacking tools to Russian broker ordered to pay $10M to former employers
US defense contractor who sold hacking tools to Russian broker ordered to pay $10M to former employers
Hackers deface school login pages after claiming another Instructure hack Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai Zack Whittaker
Hackers deface school login pages after claiming another Instructure hack
Hackers deface school login pages after claiming another Instructure hack
Google unveils Whoop-like screenless Fitbit Air Aisha Malik
Google unveils Whoop-like screenless Fitbit Air
Google unveils Whoop-like screenless Fitbit Air
Five architects of the AI economy explain where the wheels are coming off Connie Loizos
Five architects of the AI economy explain where the wheels are coming off
Five architects of the AI economy explain where the wheels are coming off
Pontos-chave
- A disputa entre Musk e Altman destaca a importância da governança ética em empresas de IA.
- A transição da OpenAI para uma entidade com fins lucrativos levanta questões sobre a missão social das startups.
- A cultura organizacional é crucial para o sucesso de empresas de tecnologia, especialmente em ambientes colaborativos.
Análise editorial
A disputa legal entre Elon Musk e Sam Altman em torno da OpenAI levanta questões cruciais sobre a governança de organizações que lidam com inteligência artificial avançada. Para o setor de tecnologia brasileiro, isso serve como um alerta sobre a importância de estruturas corporativas que garantam a segurança e a ética no desenvolvimento de IA. A experiência de Altman em ambientes de startups, como o Y Combinator, destaca a necessidade de um equilíbrio entre inovação e responsabilidade, algo que deve ser considerado por empreendedores e investidores no Brasil ao desenvolverem suas próprias iniciativas de IA.
Além disso, a tensão entre a missão original da OpenAI e sua transição para uma entidade com fins lucrativos reflete um dilema comum em startups de tecnologia. No Brasil, onde o ecossistema de startups está em crescimento, é essencial que os fundadores mantenham um foco claro em suas missões sociais, mesmo quando buscam lucros. A narrativa de Musk sobre o controle familiar sobre a OpenAI também levanta preocupações sobre a concentração de poder em mãos individuais, um tema que deve ser debatido em fóruns de tecnologia e ética no país.
Por fim, a crítica de Altman à abordagem de gestão de Musk sugere que a cultura organizacional é um fator determinante para o sucesso de empresas de tecnologia. No Brasil, onde a colaboração e a criatividade são fundamentais, é vital que os líderes promovam um ambiente de trabalho que valorize a contribuição de todos os membros da equipe. O que se observa neste caso é que a forma como os líderes interagem com suas equipes pode ter um impacto duradouro na inovação e na moral da organização, algo que deve ser uma prioridade para os fundadores brasileiros de startups de IA.
O que esta cobertura entrega
- Atribuicao clara de fonte com link para a publicacao original.
- Enquadramento editorial sobre relevancia, impacto e proximos desdobramentos.
- Revisao de legibilidade, contexto e duplicacao antes da publicacao.
Fonte original:
TechCrunch AISobre este artigo
Este artigo foi curado e publicado pelo AIDaily como parte da nossa cobertura editorial sobre desenvolvimentos em inteligência artificial. O conteúdo é baseado na fonte original citada abaixo, enriquecido com contexto e análise editorial. Ferramentas automatizadas podem auxiliar tradução e estruturação inicial, mas a decisão de publicar, a revisão factual e o enquadramento de contexto seguem responsabilidade editorial.
Saiba mais sobre nosso processo editorial