Why the rise of open source AI isn’t hurting Anthropic … yet
Open-source models’ success isn’t coming at the expense of frontier labs. Instead, they each seem to capture two phases of the same life-cycle.
On Monday, Decagon CEO Jesse Zhang published a provocative new theory, posted under the title “Everyone is wrong about open source AI in the enterprise.” The post grapples with one of the most interesting contradictions of today’s AI economy: More mature AI deployments are switching to lighter models, he says, even at his own company. But the overall spend on expensive state-of-the-art models has barely budged.
It’s a new way to think about the relationship between frontier and open-source models. In Zhang’s telling, they aren’t competitors, and open-source models’ success isn’t coming at the expense of frontier labs. Instead, they’re two phases of the same lifecycle, with expensive frontier models being used to prove out use cases that can be passed along to cheaper open-source alternatives as they mature.
As more mature use cases switch to lighter models , new use cases keep arising — and the overall spend on frontier models barely goes down.
Zhang doesn’t give much data to support the point, but the data isn’t hard to find. Vercel’s AI gateway dashboard shows that, in just the past week, DeepSeek has surged into the lead for token volumes, now processing just over a third of the tokens passing through the company’s infrastructure. Z.ai — the lab behind the popular GLM-5.2 model — jumped into a respectable fourth place over the same period.
But if you scroll down to overall token spend, you’ll see Anthropic still accounts for more than half of the overall AI spend on the platform. Given that much of the recent change comes from Anthropic’s own rising prices, the share has dropped slightly over the past month, but not significantly.
OpenRouter tells a similar story, capturing a much larger (but slightly less enterprise-y) segment of the market. Deepseek V4Flash is the main winner on overall usage, processing 5.3 trillion tokens weekly. The most popular frontier model, Opus 4.8, handles just over 2 trillion. OpenRouter doesn’t rank models by total spend, but it registers the average token cost for Opus 4.8 as roughly 23x higher than V4Flash ($1.37 per million tokens, compared to just 6 cents), which would mean Opus was still probably capturing the lion’s share of spending.
Those figures don’t even capture the newest arrival, Nvidia’s Nemotron, which is poised to leap to the front of the pack by virtue of Nvidia’s strong connections and the model’s own extreme adaptability.
Those figures don’t fully prove Zhang’s point about the AI lifecycles, but they do show frontier labs like Anthropic aren’t suffering too much from the rise of open source — at least not yet. One explanation is that the market of AI-addressable tasks is growing so fast that the top models are able to maintain their position just by dominating early-stage deployments. As Zhang puts it, “The frontier labs will keep owning discovery. Open source will increasingly own production.” Another explanation might be that, even as clients move to open-source, many use cases are so difficult that they can’t be entirely replaced with cheaper alternatives.
Either way, this two-tiered economy of models may become a relatively stable feature of the AI economy.
As recently as last September, I was writing about the possibility that foundation labs would end up selling coffee beans to Starbucks — that is, serving as commodity inputs while the application layer reaped the benefits. Some parts of that prediction came true: vertical AI plays switched to lighter models, for one, and the economics of “GPT wrapper” startups have remained mostly stable.
But we’re also seeing that, token for token, frontier providers have been able to hold on to the most desirable part of the marketplace. the premium token price. And that doesn’t seem likely to change any time soon.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Last chance to save up to $190 on TechCrunch Founder Summit. Join 1,000+ founders and VCs at all stages for real-world scaling insights and connections that move the needle. Savings end June 26, 11:59 p.m. PT .
Amazon will stop accepting new customers for Mechanical Turk Anthony Ha
Amazon will stop accepting new customers for Mechanical Turk
Amazon will stop accepting new customers for Mechanical Turk
5 desk gadgets that can make your workday better Aisha Malik
5 desk gadgets that can make your workday better
5 desk gadgets that can make your workday better
Chevy built an all-American EV truck — why is nobody buying it? Tim De Chant
Chevy built an all-American EV truck — why is nobody buying it?
Chevy built an all-American EV truck — why is nobody buying it?
Mark Zuckerberg tells staff that AI agents haven’t progressed as quickly as he’d hoped Lucas Ropek
Mark Zuckerberg tells staff that AI agents haven’t progressed as quickly as he’d hoped
Mark Zuckerberg tells staff that AI agents haven’t progressed as quickly as he’d hoped
Jersey Mike’s IPO illustrates how bad the AI hype has become Julie Bort
Jersey Mike’s IPO illustrates how bad the AI hype has become
Jersey Mike’s IPO illustrates how bad the AI hype has become
After $18B IPO, Bending Spoons founder says success comes from minimizing luck Anna Heim
After $18B IPO, Bending Spoons founder says success comes from minimizing luck
After $18B IPO, Bending Spoons founder says success comes from minimizing luck
The ‘Father of the Internet’ is finally retiring Tim Fernholz
The ‘Father of the Internet’ is finally retiring
The ‘Father of the Internet’ is finally retiring
Pontos-chave
- A ascensão dos modelos de IA de código aberto pode democratizar o acesso à tecnologia no Brasil, beneficiando startups.
- Modelos de ponta e de código aberto podem coexistir, cada um atendendo a diferentes necessidades do mercado.
- O investimento em IA no Brasil pode mudar, com empresas buscando soluções mais acessíveis e escaláveis.
Análise editorial
A discussão sobre a ascensão dos modelos de IA de código aberto e seu impacto sobre laboratórios de ponta, como a Anthropic, é particularmente relevante para o setor de tecnologia brasileiro. O Brasil tem visto um aumento significativo no desenvolvimento de soluções de IA, e a adoção de modelos abertos pode democratizar o acesso a tecnologias avançadas, permitindo que startups e empresas menores experimentem e implementem IA sem os altos custos associados a modelos proprietários. Isso pode estimular a inovação local e criar um ambiente mais competitivo.
Além disso, a ideia de que modelos de código aberto e modelos de ponta coexistem em diferentes fases do ciclo de vida da IA sugere que o mercado pode estar se diversificando. Enquanto os modelos de ponta continuam a ser utilizados para validar casos de uso complexos, os modelos abertos podem se tornar a escolha preferida para aplicações mais simples e escaláveis. Essa dinâmica pode levar a um aumento na colaboração entre empresas de tecnologia, onde as melhores práticas e aprendizados são compartilhados, beneficiando o ecossistema como um todo.
O que observar a seguir é como as empresas brasileiras responderão a essa tendência. Com a crescente popularidade dos modelos de código aberto, pode haver uma mudança na forma como as empresas investem em IA. As startups podem se sentir mais inclinadas a adotar soluções abertas, enquanto as grandes empresas podem precisar reavaliar suas estratégias de investimento em modelos proprietários. Isso pode resultar em um ambiente de inovação mais ágil e adaptável, onde as empresas buscam constantemente otimizar seus recursos e explorar novas oportunidades.
Por fim, é importante considerar o papel das grandes empresas de tecnologia, como Nvidia, no cenário brasileiro. A presença de gigantes do setor pode influenciar a adoção de tecnologias de ponta e moldar o futuro da IA no Brasil. A capacidade dessas empresas de se adaptarem rapidamente às necessidades do mercado local será crucial para determinar como o setor se desenvolverá nos próximos anos.
O que esta cobertura entrega
- Atribuicao clara de fonte com link para a publicacao original.
- Enquadramento editorial sobre relevancia, impacto e proximos desdobramentos.
- Revisao de legibilidade, contexto e duplicacao antes da publicacao.
Fonte original:
TechCrunch AISobre este artigo
Este artigo foi curado e publicado pelo AIDaily como parte da nossa cobertura editorial sobre desenvolvimentos em inteligência artificial. O conteúdo é baseado na fonte original citada abaixo, enriquecido com contexto e análise editorial. Ferramentas automatizadas podem auxiliar tradução e estruturação inicial, mas a decisão de publicar, a revisão factual e o enquadramento de contexto seguem responsabilidade editorial.
Saiba mais sobre nosso processo editorial