Anthropic’s newest ad is creeping people out
Anthropic has consistently attempted to depict itself as the ethical foil to other AI companies. This latest marketing stunt — which leans into criticism of AI as a way to make Anthropic seem aware of the responsibility it carries — would appear to be more of the same.
Anthropic is known for its creative marketing, but the AI company may have been a little bit too creative when it conjured up its most recent advertisement.
Titled “There’s hope in hard questions,” the company’s latest ad has been unsettling viewers with its weird imagery and doomer-ist tone.
The ad begins with a video of a burning house (not exactly a heartwarming start) before pivoting to a series of still images. These images include a crowd of people being surveilled by facial recognition, a homeless person sleeping on the street, rows upon rows of tombstones in a cemetery, and what appears to be a group of laborers toiling in a mine where (presumably) raw materials for smartphones are being dug up.
Meanwhile, a voice-over track features different people asking questions like “Can AI be trusted?” and “Who’s gonna hit the brakes if we need to?”
In short: Not exactly the family-friendly crowd-pleaser of the year. At the same time, it’s also not particularly far afield from the company’s past messaging. Anthropic has consistently attempted to depict itself as the ethical foil to other AI companies. This latest marketing stunt — which leans into criticism of AI as a way to make Anthropic seem aware of (and therefore distinctly worthy of) the responsibility it carries — would appear to be more of the same.
Sam Altman — the CEO of OpenAI, Anthropic’s chief rival — kicked off the criticism with some pithy trolling. “i thought this was satire, kept looking for the handle to be spelled c1audeai or something,” Altman posted to X on Monday .
Other skeptics — many of whom seem to work in the tech industry — came out of the woodwork to remark upon Anthropic’s odd choice of imagery and tone.
“Anthropic is quite an amazing company. With the worst corporate communications ever,” another person said .
“[T]he EAs [effective altruists] at anthropic really must be living in a bubble of ai psychosis to think this would go down well,” a critical poster remarked .
As some have pointed out , Anthropic is following a very time-tested marketing playbook here. That playbook involves a brand calling out and owning the harms caused by its industry as a way to demonstrate that it is the company best positioned to avoid or correct those harms.
But even if it’s a familiar playbook, it seems to have backfired here — particularly the decision to include a brief shot that appears to be from Arlington National Cemetery. “I can’t stress enough how fucked up it is that Anthropic is running an ad that includes this image asking ‘Who’s gonna hit the brakes if we need to?’” said one commenter, sharing the cemetery image that appears in the ad.
People kept coming back to the graveyard imagery. “Out of everything in that ad, this part was exceptionally weird and sinister,” another person wrote , sharing the same image.
Personally, the ad vaguely reminds me of the propaganda sequence in “The Parallax View” — the 1970s paranoid thriller about an evil corporation involved in an MK-Ultra-esque conspiracy to create brainwashed assassins. This is probably not the best association to have for a company that would like to prove it is acting as a force for good in the world.
Anthropic’s marketing has made a splash before. In February, during the Super Bowl, the company unleashed a slew of ads that humorously took aim at OpenAI’s decision to include ads in ChatGPT . Those ads earned it a good amount of positive buzz — as well as the smoldering rage of its competitor.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Last chance to save up to $190 on TechCrunch Founder Summit. Join 1,000+ founders and VCs at all stages for real-world scaling insights and connections that move the needle. Savings end June 26, 11:59 p.m. PT .
Satya Nadella has issued a shocking warning to companies using AI Julie Bort
Satya Nadella has issued a shocking warning to companies using AI
Satya Nadella has issued a shocking warning to companies using AI
The wildest allegations in Apple’s trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI Sarah Perez
The wildest allegations in Apple’s trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI
The wildest allegations in Apple’s trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI
Anthropic starts localizing Claude pricing for India, its biggest market after the US Jagmeet Singh
Anthropic starts localizing Claude pricing for India, its biggest market after the US
Anthropic starts localizing Claude pricing for India, its biggest market after the US
Meta removes controversial AI feature on Instagram after backlash Lucas Ropek
Meta removes controversial AI feature on Instagram after backlash
Meta removes controversial AI feature on Instagram after backlash
Apple sues OpenAI over alleged trade secret theft Sarah Perez
Apple sues OpenAI over alleged trade secret theft
Apple sues OpenAI over alleged trade secret theft
Elon Musk praises Mythos/Fable, promises not to ‘cut off’ Anthropic Julie Bort
Elon Musk praises Mythos/Fable, promises not to ‘cut off’ Anthropic
Elon Musk praises Mythos/Fable, promises not to ‘cut off’ Anthropic
Instagram users: Here’s how to stop Meta’s AI from using your photos Lauren Forristal
Instagram users: Here’s how to stop Meta’s AI from using your photos
Instagram users: Here’s how to stop Meta’s AI from using your photos
Key takeaways
- Anthropic's campaign highlights the importance of ethics in technology companies' communication.
- The disconnect between Anthropic's message and local realities may hinder its acceptance in Brazil.
- The negative response to the campaign suggests that companies should align their communications with audience values.
Editorial analysis
Anthropic's recent advertising campaign raises important questions about ethics and responsibility in the communication of technology companies, especially in the artificial intelligence sector. By opting for an approach that highlights the darker aspects of technology, Anthropic aims to position itself as an ethical alternative in a market saturated with optimistic promises. However, this strategy may be seen as an attempt to capitalize on fear and distrust regarding AI, which may not resonate well with the public, especially in a country like Brazil, where the perception of technology is often shaped by social and economic concerns.
In the Brazilian context, where social inequality and lack of access to technology remain significant challenges, the choice of imagery that evokes despair and surveillance can be particularly problematic. Technology companies' communication must be sensitive to local realities, and Anthropic seems to have failed to consider how its message could be received in different cultural contexts. This could result in a disconnect between the company and the public, hindering its acceptance in the Brazilian market.
Moreover, the negative response to the campaign suggests that Anthropic's marketing strategy may have underestimated the intelligence and sensitivity of the audience. Using impactful imagery to spark discussion can be a valid tactic, but when poorly executed, it can lead to backlash that harms the brand's reputation. What we observe here is a lesson on the importance of aligning brand communication with the values and concerns of the target audience, especially in such a delicate sector as AI.
Finally, the repercussions of this campaign may influence other technology companies to reconsider their marketing approaches. What is expected now is a deeper reflection on how companies communicate their messages and the responsibility they have in shaping public perception of artificial intelligence. Anthropic, by positioning itself as an ethical voice, needs to demonstrate that its actions and communications align with that ideal; otherwise, it risks being seen as just another company seeking attention at any cost.
What this coverage includes
- Clear source attribution and link to the original publication.
- Editorial framing about relevance, impact, and likely next developments.
- Review for readability, context, and duplication before publication.
Original source:
TechCrunch AIAbout this article
This article was curated and published by AIDaily as part of our editorial coverage of artificial intelligence developments. The content is based on the original source cited below, enriched with editorial context and analysis. Automated tools may assist with translation and initial structuring, but publication decisions, factual review, and contextual framing remain editorial responsibilities.
Learn more about our editorial process