Editorial Policy
Publishing criteria
The standards, principles, and processes that guide every editorial decision at AIDaily.
How we evaluate a story
AIDaily tracks news, reports, research, and product announcements related to AI. A story should only remain published when it can answer three questions: what happened, why it matters, and what the likely impact is for readers following the sector.
Very short copy, articles without original editorial context, or material that depends too heavily on the source wording must be reviewed before re-indexing.
Every article goes through an evaluation process that considers: thematic relevance to the AI ecosystem, timeliness and recency of the information, potential impact on technology professionals and interested readers, quality and reliability of the source, and whether the story adds new information or perspective to the existing coverage landscape.
Content quality standards
Published articles on AIDaily must meet the following minimum quality criteria:
Minimum content length
Articles must have sufficient depth to provide meaningful context and analysis. Short notes or surface-level summaries that don't add editorial value are not published.
Original editorial synthesis
Every article must add original editorial value. We don't simply translate or republish source material — we contextualize, analyze, and explain why the topic matters.
Source attribution
All original sources must be clearly identified and linked. Readers should always be able to trace information back to its origin.
Factual accuracy
Claims, data points, and technical details must be accurate. When we cannot independently verify information, we explicitly note the source of the claim.
Context and impact
Stories must explain not just what happened, but why it matters and what the likely implications are for the broader AI ecosystem.
Readability
Technical content must be presented in a way that is accessible to our diverse audience, from industry professionals to interested general readers.
Content sources and curation
AIDaily monitors a curated selection of trusted technology sources, including academic journals, official company blogs, established technology publications, and vetted RSS feeds. Sources are evaluated for reliability, accuracy, and editorial standards before being added to our monitoring pipeline.
When source material is in English, we may use automated translation tools as a starting point, but the published version always includes original editorial context, analysis, and proper source attribution. We are transparent about when AI tools assist in our editorial process.
We actively avoid: content from unverified or unreliable sources, stories that are purely speculative without factual basis, duplicate coverage of the same event without adding new perspective, and content that doesn't meet our minimum quality thresholds.
Principles
- 1Prioritize relevance, accuracy, and context before speed.
- 2Clearly identify the original source behind every story.
- 3Add original editorial value instead of only translating or compressing third-party text.
- 4Avoid publishing notes that are too short, incomplete, or lacking context.
- 5Correct or remove content that does not meet the expected standard.
Editorial independence
AIDaily's editorial decisions are independent from commercial interests. Advertising placements (via Google AdSense) do not influence which stories we cover, how we cover them, or what analysis we provide. Editorial content and advertising are kept strictly separate.
We do not accept payment for publishing specific content, and sponsored content — if ever introduced — would be clearly labeled and distinguished from editorial content.
Review and removal process
Content that no longer meets our editorial standards may be updated, corrected, or removed. Reasons for editorial action include: factual inaccuracies, insufficient context, outdated information that could mislead readers, source attribution issues, or content that falls below our minimum quality thresholds.
All significant editorial changes are documented in accordance with our corrections policy. We believe in transparent editorial practices that build and maintain reader trust.
Editorial contact
For editorial inquiries, story suggestions, copyright concerns, or questions about our editorial standards, please reach out to our editorial team: