Elon Musk and Sam Altman are going to court over OpenAI’s future
After a yearslong legal feud, Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman are heading to trial this week in Northern California in a case that could have sweeping consequences. Ahead of OpenAI’s highly anticipated IPO, the court could rule on whether the company is allowed to exist as a for-profit enterprise and might even oust…
After a yearslong legal feud, Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman are heading to trial this week in Northern California in a case that could have sweeping consequences. Ahead of OpenAI’s highly anticipated IPO, the court could rule on whether the company is allowed to exist as a for-profit enterprise and might even oust its current executive leadership, including Altman. Musk is suing OpenAI, alleging that Altman and OpenAI president Greg Brockman deceived him into bankrolling the company in its early days by promising to maintain it as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI that benefits humanity, only to later restructure the company to operate a for-profit subsidiary. Musk cofounded OpenAI with Altman and others in 2015, but he left in 2018 after a bitter power struggle. Musk is seeking as much as $134 billion in damages from OpenAI and Microsoft, one of OpenAI’s biggest financial backers. He is also asking the court to remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and to restore OpenAI as a nonprofit. Musk has asked the court to award any damages to OpenAI’s nonprofit rather than to him personally. Nine jurors will deliver an advisory verdict, a non-binding recommendation, to guide the judge in deciding Musk’s claims against Altman. Musk, Altman, and Brockman will take the stand. Former OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Sutskever, former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella are also expected to testify. Cringey texts, raw diary entries, and endless scheming behind the founding and growth of OpenAI are expected to come to light. In an industry enveloped in secrecy, the trial will be a rare opportunity for the public to look behind the curtain and find out what’s going on in the companies creating the most transformative technology ever built. What are they fighting about? When OpenAI was originally founded as a nonprofit, backed by a $38 million donation from Musk, the company vowed to create open-source technology for the public’s benefit, unconstrained by a need to generate financial returns. But over the years, the company began to claim that intensifying competition could make it dangerous to share how it develops its AI models and that a nonprofit structure could not raise enough money to keep building AI. ( MIT Technology Review was first to report on OpenAI’s internal conflicts around its mission.) The court has already found that in 2017 Altman and Brockman wanted to establish a for-profit arm, while Musk proposed merging OpenAI with his electric-car company, Tesla. When Musk threatened to stop funding, Altman and Brockman told him that they were committed to keeping the company a nonprofit. Musk alleges that they pursued plans to pivot to a for-profit without informing him. According to OpenAI, Musk agreed that the company needed a for-profit entity and even wanted to be its CEO. But even if Musk proves he was duped by Altman and Brockman, he may not have standing in the first place to sue them for restructuring the company to operate a for-profit subsidiary. Some legal scholars are puzzled over why the judge allowed him to bring this claim. “The idea that Elon Musk can sue because he was a donor or used to be on the board is pretty puzzling,” says Jill Horwitz, a law professor who studies nonprofit law at Northwestern University. “Typically, it’s up to the attorneys general to bring such a claim to enforce the charitable purposes. And that’s already happened.” In October 2025, state attorneys general of California, where OpenAI is headquartered, and Delaware, where OpenAI is incorporated, struck a deal with OpenAI to approve its new corporate structure on a series of conditions . For example, a safety and security committee at the nonprofit would review safety-related decisions made by the for-profit subsidiary. Critics of the restructuring, including Musk, AI safety advocates, and civil society groups, have tried to stop it. California’s attorney general has declined to join Musk’s lawsuit, saying that the office did not see how his action serves the public interest. Still, whether the deal holds OpenAI to its nonprofit mission is an open question. “Elon Musk should have to show … what the deficiencies are in what’s been agreed to by OpenAI with the attorneys general,” says Rose Chan Loui, the director of the UCLA School of Law’s philanthropy and nonprofit program. Even with the terms in place, holding OpenAI to them depends on “how much they can enforce it and how much transparency they get into OpenAI’s work.” More importantly, legal experts say the case is being considered under the wrong body of law. Musk argues that Altman and Brockman breached OpenAI’s charitable trust by creating a closed-source, for-profit subsidiary. As a result, the court has been analyzing the claim under the law of trusts . “But OpenAI is not a trust. OpenAI is a corporation. And so really they should be looking at … the law of charitable nonprofit organizations ,” says Chan Loui. What’s on the line? Despite all the legal muddiness, the outcome of the trial could upend the AI race. Any one of the remedies that Musk seeks could cripple OpenAI as it races to go public by the end of the year. OpenAI, which is valued at over $850 billion, has described the litigation with Musk as a potential risk to its business. Musk’s rival company xAI, which makes the chatbot Grok, is expected to go public as a part of his rocket company SpaceX as early as June. If Musk prevails, xAI, which in combination with SpaceX is valued at $1.25 trillion , could get a big advantage in the AI race. And the trial has helped expose the bitter schism between Musk and the company he once helped to found. An OpenAI spokesperson referred MIT Technology Review to a post on X: “This lawsuit has always been a baseless and jealous bid to derail a competitor.” Although Musk’s lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment, he has posted on X that “Scam Altman lies as easily as he breathes.” MIT Technology Review will have ongoing coverage of Musk v. Altman until its conclusion. Follow @techreview or @michelletomkim on X for up-to-the-minute reporting.
Key takeaways
- The trial could redefine OpenAI's structure and impact trust in tech startups.
- The situation raises questions about ethics and responsibility in AI development.
- The case may influence business models of tech companies in Brazil.
Editorial analysis
The trial between Elon Musk and Sam Altman represents a significant milestone in OpenAI's trajectory and, by extension, in the global artificial intelligence ecosystem. The dispute is not merely a matter of corporate governance; it touches on fundamental themes regarding ethics and responsibility in the development of technologies that have the potential to shape humanity's future. For the Brazilian tech sector, which is still maturing, this situation serves as a warning about the importance of maintaining transparency and integrity in the promises made by startups and tech companies. This case may influence how investors and founders interact and define their missions, especially in an environment where trust is a precious asset.
Moreover, the possibility of reverting OpenAI to a non-profit organization raises questions about the business models that many AI startups are adopting. OpenAI's success in attracting substantial investments while still promoting the idea that technology should benefit society could create a precedent that other Brazilian companies may follow or avoid. How the court decides on OpenAI's structure could impact public perception of the role of tech companies and their social obligations.
Finally, the trial may open up space for broader discussions about regulation and oversight in the AI sector. As technology advances, the need for robust governance becomes increasingly evident. Brazil, which seeks to position itself as a relevant player in the global AI landscape, should closely monitor the developments of this case, as they may influence future policies and regulations that will affect the development of emerging technologies in the country.
What this coverage includes
- Clear source attribution and link to the original publication.
- Editorial framing about relevance, impact, and likely next developments.
- Review for readability, context, and duplication before publication.
Original source:
MIT Technology Review AIAbout this article
This article was curated and published by AIDaily as part of our editorial coverage of artificial intelligence developments. The content is based on the original source cited below, enriched with editorial context and analysis. Automated tools may assist with translation and initial structuring, but publication decisions, factual review, and contextual framing remain editorial responsibilities.
Learn more about our editorial process