Laid-off Oracle workers tried to negotiate better severance. Oracle said no.
Some found out they didn't qualify for WARN Act protections like two-months notice because the company had classified them as remote workers.
As was widely reported, Oracle axed an estimated 20,000 to 30,000 people via email on March 31.
One of the employees cut that day told TechCrunch about the experience: “I had, like, this weird feeling in my stomach. I went to go sign into the VPN, and the VPN was like, ‘this user doesn’t exist anymore.’ Then I called my friend, and I was like, ‘Hey, can you see me in Slack?’ And she said, ‘No, your account’s been deactivated.’”
The person soon received an email stating their role was terminated immediately. The severance offer arrived a few days later. But Oracle’s terms would quickly become a point of contention — and some laid-off employees would push back.
Oracle offered fairly standard Corporate America terms to laid off employees. In exchange for signing a release waiving their right to sue, employees received four weeks of pay for the first year, plus one additional week per year of service, capped at 26 weeks. The company was also paying for one month of COBRA insurance.
The catch: Although stock compensation often makes up a good chunk of a tech worker’s pay, particularly at Oracle, the company did not accelerate soon-to-vest RSUs. Any shares that hadn’t vested by the termination date were forfeited.
That held true even for stock granted as retention incentives or in place of salary increases tied to promotions. One long-tenured employee lost $1 million in stock that was just four months from vesting; RSUs made up about 70% of his compensation, Time reported .
Some employees also discovered that if they were classified as remote workers by the company, and didn’t work in a state with stronger worker provisions like California or New York, the company said they didn’t qualify for WARN Act protections.
This Week Only: Buy one pass, get the second at 50% off
This Week Only: Buy one pass, get the second at 50% off
The WARN Act is a law that requires companies conducting mass layoffs to give employees two months notice prior to letting them go. It’s triggered when 50 or more people are impacted at one location. By classifying employees as remote workers, the minimum location requirements can be sidestepped.
Some people were unaware they were classified as remote workers, because they were near an office and worked on a hybrid schedule.
Even if they were covered by the WARN Act, this did not necessarily extend severance, the former Oracle employee said. That’s because Oracle included the two-months’ WARN notice pay in its existing calculation of four-weeks, plus one week per year.
For a short time, a group of employees tried to negotiate en masse with Oracle, according to a letter seen by TechCrunch. At least 90 people signed a public petition urging the database and cloud computing giant to match the terms of other big tech companies conducting mass layoffs in the name of AI.
For instance, Meta’s severance package, according to an email published by Business Insider, started at 16 weeks of base pay, plus two weeks for every year of employment and covered COBRA for 18 months.
Microsoft, which extended voluntary retirement offers to long-serving employees, provided accelerated stock vesting, a minimum of eight weeks’ pay, and an additional one to two weeks for every six months of service, depending on rank, the Seattle Times reported.
And Cloudflare, which just cut 20% of its employees, offered lump sum severance that was the equivalent of base pay through the end of 2026, plus healthcare coverage through the end of the year, and accelerated vesting of stock through August 15. So if an employee was close to obtaining another tranche, they will get it.
Oracle declined to negotiate, according to an email seen by TechCrunch. It was a take-it-or-leave scenario, the employee said.
When asked about its severance terms, classifying employees as remote, and the failed attempt by employees to negotiate more, Oracle declined to comment.
Such a reaction from the company isn’t a surprise, not even to those who hoped to negotiate. But it does underscore that for all the theoretical high pay (often via stocks) and perks that tech workers enjoy when it’s an employees’ market, they have very few protections in place when it isn’t.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
StrictlyVC Athens is up next. Hear unfiltered insights straight from Europe’s tech leaders and connect with the people shaping what’s ahead. Lock in your spot before it’s gone.
Hackers deface school login pages after claiming another Instructure hack Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai Zack Whittaker
Hackers deface school login pages after claiming another Instructure hack
Hackers deface school login pages after claiming another Instructure hack
reMarkable’s new Paper Pure tablet goes back to basics with a monochrome screen Ivan Mehta
reMarkable’s new Paper Pure tablet goes back to basics with a monochrome screen
reMarkable’s new Paper Pure tablet goes back to basics with a monochrome screen
Hackers steal students’ data during breach at education tech giant Instructure Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai
Hackers steal students’ data during breach at education tech giant Instructure
Hackers steal students’ data during breach at education tech giant Instructure
As workers worry about AI, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang says AI is ‘creating an enormous number of jobs’ Lucas Ropek
As workers worry about AI, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang says AI is ‘creating an enormous number of jobs’
As workers worry about AI, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang says AI is ‘creating an enormous number of jobs’
Anthropic and OpenAI are both launching joint ventures for enterprise AI services Russell Brandom
Anthropic and OpenAI are both launching joint ventures for enterprise AI services
Anthropic and OpenAI are both launching joint ventures for enterprise AI services
Ouster’s new color lidar is coming to replace cameras Sean O'Kane
Ouster’s new color lidar is coming to replace cameras
Ouster’s new color lidar is coming to replace cameras
This tiny, magnetic e-reader could stop you from doomscrolling Amanda Silberling
This tiny, magnetic e-reader could stop you from doomscrolling
This tiny, magnetic e-reader could stop you from doomscrolling
Key takeaways
- Mass layoffs at Oracle highlight the fragility of employment in the tech sector.
- The classification of remote workers can impact rights and compensations.
- Clear communication is essential to maintain employee trust.
Editorial analysis
The mass layoffs at Oracle, affecting between 20,000 and 30,000 employees, reveal not only the fragility of employment in the tech sector but also raise questions about worker classification and their rights. In Brazil, where labor laws are stricter and worker protection is a recurring theme, this situation can serve as a warning for local companies. The practice of terminating employees without notice, especially in a remote work scenario, can lead to legal and reputational repercussions for companies that do not respect employee rights.
Moreover, the issue of unaccelerated stock compensation (RSUs) can impact professionals' perceptions of financial security in their careers. In Brazil, where the startup and tech culture is on the rise, talent retention is crucial. The loss of significant benefits, such as shares that represent a substantial part of compensation, may discourage qualified professionals from staying in companies that adopt similar practices.
Oracle's case also highlights the importance of clear and transparent communication with employees, especially in times of economic uncertainty. The lack of clarity regarding classification as remote workers and its legal implications can lead to dissatisfaction and distrust among the workforce. Brazilian companies should pay attention to these aspects to avoid conflicts and maintain a healthy work environment.
Finally, Oracle's situation may indicate a broader trend in the tech sector, where mass layoffs become a common response to financial challenges. Brazilian companies should monitor these trends and consider how they can differentiate themselves by adopting more ethical and respectful practices towards their employees, especially in an increasingly competitive talent market.
What this coverage includes
- Clear source attribution and link to the original publication.
- Editorial framing about relevance, impact, and likely next developments.
- Review for readability, context, and duplication before publication.
Original source:
TechCrunch AIAbout this article
This article was curated and published by AIDaily as part of our editorial coverage of artificial intelligence developments. The content is based on the original source cited below, enriched with editorial context and analysis. Automated tools may assist with translation and initial structuring, but publication decisions, factual review, and contextual framing remain editorial responsibilities.
Learn more about our editorial process