Meta removes controversial AI feature on Instagram after backlash

Published byAIDaily Editorial Team

July 11, 2026

3 min read

Original source author: Lucas Ropek

"Our intent was to provide a useful creative tool and to give people control over whether their public content could be referenced in this way," the company said in a blog post. "We've heard the feedback that this feature missed the mark, so it's no longer available."

Meta has axed a controversial feature that allowed users to modify photos from public Instagram accounts using AI. The feature, which was rolled out earlier this week along with a batch of other AI tools, “missed the mark” and is no longer available, according to the company.

Earlier this week, Meta announced Muse Image, a new AI image generator built by Meta Superintelligence Labs, its dedicated AI unit. Meta promoted one feature that allowed individuals to generate images by @-mentioning public Instagram accounts that they wanted to reference. The feature, which wasn’t designed to alert a user if their photos were used in this way, prompted immediate backlash.

TechCrunch wrote its own guide on how to disable the feature.

Now Meta has reversed course. The company issued a blog post Friday announcing that it was removing the feature. Puck News founding partner Dylan Byers was the first to share the company’s decision .

“Our intent was to provide a useful creative tool and to give people control over whether their public content could be referenced in this way,” the company posted on its blog. “We’ve heard the feedback that this feature missed the mark, so it’s no longer available.”

TechCrunch reached out to Meta for more information and will update this article if it responds.

Since its integration with social media platforms, AI has been misused with wild abandon — often to generate naked images of female celebrities . Platforms have attempted to mitigate this trend, although the guardrails introduced have often fallen short.

In the case of Meta’s newly nixed feature, it seems somewhat obvious that it would have been abused in this way. Indeed, Byers notes that the decision to do away with the feature came “amid scrutiny from users and talent agencies, including CAA.”

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Last chance to save up to $190 on TechCrunch Founder Summit. Join 1,000+ founders and VCs at all stages for real-world scaling insights and connections that move the needle. Savings end June 26, 11:59 p.m. PT .

Instagram users: Here’s how to stop Meta’s AI from using your photos Lauren Forristal

Instagram users: Here’s how to stop Meta’s AI from using your photos

Figma acquires team behind a vibe-coding app Ivan Mehta

Figma acquires team behind a vibe-coding app

If you use Google, you’re training its AI. Here’s how to opt out. Sarah Perez

If you use Google, you’re training its AI. Here’s how to opt out.

Reddit is using LLMs to solve a problem LLMs largely created Amanda Silberling

Reddit is using LLMs to solve a problem LLMs largely created

Amazon will stop accepting new customers for Mechanical Turk Anthony Ha

Amazon will stop accepting new customers for Mechanical Turk

5 desk gadgets that can make your workday better Aisha Malik

5 desk gadgets that can make your workday better

Almost 90 new unicorns have been minted so far this year — here they are Dominic-Madori Davis

Almost 90 new unicorns have been minted so far this year — here they are

Key takeaways

Meta's removal of the feature reflects growing concerns about privacy and ethical AI use.

Meta's swift reversal suggests the company is attentive to user feedback, but raises questions about implementing adequate controls.

The case may indicate a growing movement among consumers seeking greater control over their personal information.

Editorial analysis

Meta's decision to remove the controversial photo modification feature on Instagram highlights the growing concerns regarding privacy and the ethical use of artificial intelligence on social media. In Brazil, where personal data protection is governed by the General Data Protection Law (LGPD), this situation raises questions about how tech companies should approach the creation of tools that could potentially infringe on users' image rights and privacy. The negative backlash from users and talent agencies indicates that trust in digital platforms is at stake, and companies need to be more transparent and responsible in their innovations.

Moreover, Meta's swift reversal suggests that the company is attentive to user feedback, which could be a positive sign for the future of technology-society interaction. However, it also raises the question of how companies can implement adequate safeguards before launching new features. Failures in implementing usage controls can result in irreparable damage to a brand's reputation, especially in a competitive market like technology.

Looking at the broader landscape, the reaction to Meta's tool may indicate a growing movement among consumers seeking greater control over their personal information. Companies that fail to adapt to this demand may face significant pushback. For Brazil, where the digital culture is rapidly evolving, it is crucial for tech companies to consider the social and legal implications of their innovations, especially in an environment where regulation is becoming increasingly stringent. What follows may include increased pressure for stricter regulations on AI use in social platforms, as well as a renewed focus on product development practices that prioritize user ethics and privacy.

Meta removes controversial AI feature on Instagram after backlash

Key takeaways

Editorial analysis

What this coverage includes

About this article