Artificial Intelligence

Nobody wants to tell me why they only listen their own Suno slop

Published byAIDaily Editorial Team
4 min read
Original source author: Terrence O’Brien

There's this alarming trend in the Suno subreddit. People aren't just prompting AI songs; they're sitting around listening almost exclusively to their own slop. And in some cases, they proudly proclaim that they don't listen to music on traditional streaming platforms anymore - it's just AI all day. "Does anyone just listen to their own […]

Share:

Suno users are abandoning real music for whatever AI spits out.

Suno users are abandoning real music for whatever AI spits out.

There’s this alarming trend in the Suno subreddit. People aren’t just prompting AI songs; they’re sitting around listening almost exclusively to their own slop. And in some cases, they proudly proclaim that they don’t listen to music on traditional streaming platforms anymore — it’s just AI all day.

“Does anyone just listen to their own music now and not even music on Spotify anymore.?”

“I definitely listen to my own music most of the time now. Why wouldn’t I? It’s album after album of bangers”

“Guilty as charged. It’s an infectious addiction, and I love it.”

“I thought I was the only one that had an addiction to suno. ”

“Last.fm says I listened to my own (AI music) 2239 times in the last 365 days.”

“Definitely dude I’ve produced hundreds of songs and yeah I hardly ever use Spotify bc I favor my own stuff more”

I wanted to understand why users were consuming their own AI content over real artists’ music. So I reached out to well over a dozen people who have posted in r/SunoAI about primarily listening to their own slop, but nobody was willing to talk to me. Nobody seemed to want to go on record and explain why they preferred the hollow, polished-to-death output of Suno to the work of musicians or songwriters who had spent a lifetime honing their craft.

That left me scouring Reddit posts for explanations, and the best I got was this:

“The music I’ve generated is without a doubt better matched to my taste than most music made by real artists/bands.“

“Yes I definitely just listen to my own music now. It is the only place I can get the far out genres — country/rap and electronic dance/rap.”

First off, if you can’t find music that matches your tastes, or “ far out genres ,” then you’re just not trying hard enough. As for the specific examples of “country/rap and electronic dance/rap,” part of me wants to believe this person is trolling, but a quick perusal of their Reddit posts suggests that’s not the case.

There has been country-inflected hip hop since nearly the beginning. An early example being 1980’s “ Blowfly’s Rapp ” by Blowfly. The post also ignores the existence of Kid Rock, Bubba Sparxxx, Big & Rich, and Lil Nas X’s “Old Town Road.”

Hip hop has also been inextricably linked to dance music since its birth. Afrika Bambaataa sampled Kraftwerk, “ The Power ” by Snap! featured multiple verses by rapper Turbo B, and Vince Staples’ Big Fish Theory borrows heavily from UK Garage and features production by the late Sophie . There are even entire subgenres like Hip House , Electro Rap , and Crunk that prominently feature synths and are geared towards the dance floor.

How to find music you will love without the algorithm

Spotify says its AI remix tool is for superfans, but I’m not convinced

AI music is flooding streaming services — but who wants it?

Suno’s upgraded AI music generator is technically impressive, but still soulless

That leaves me with two leading theories: narcissism or laziness.

YouTuber and bassist Adam Neely seems to firmly believe this pattern is driven largely by narcissism and that it’s potentially a byproduct of hyper-personalization. While I think there is an element of narcissism at play, personally, I’m more inclined to believe it’s laziness. People are inherently drawn to instant gratification. Why spend years mastering the bass when you can simply type a prompt? Suno gives people who want to see themselves as musicians — and don’t want to spend time learning an instrument — a shortcut.

Even if they just want to listen to music and don’t envision themselves as artists, finding music you like takes work. The age of streaming, self-distribution, and the decline of global monoculture can make being a consumer of media overwhelming. If the algorithm is failing you , if the major music outlets don’t align with your tastes, or you don’t have friends to help you cut through all the noise , it can be frustrating to find music you like. It takes time and effort even in the best-case scenario. So, some people might be turning to AI as a way to skip scouring Bandcamp or following people on Record Club .

Which might explain why nobody wanted to talk to me. The Suno subreddit is a safe place, filled with people doing the same thing. They don’t feel insecure or embarrassed. They have their bubble where people are supportive. And, look, I get it: nobody wants to be called lazy or a narcissist.

Of course, there is a third option: they don’t actually like music or care about art, and they don’t care to defend their low-effort relationship with it.

Ferrari reveals its first EV, with design help from Jony Ive

Sennheiser’s new Momentum 5 headphones have upgraded ANC and a replaceable battery

Google’s new anything-to-anything AI model is wild

The best Memorial Day sales you can shop this weekend

Key takeaways

  • Suno users are preferring their own AI-generated creations over traditional artists' music, reflecting extreme personalization in music.
  • This trend may negatively impact the Brazilian music industry by decreasing consumption of local artists' music.
  • The rise of AI-generated music raises questions about originality, authenticity, and copyright in music creation.

Editorial analysis

The trend observed in the Suno subreddit, where users prefer to listen to their own AI-generated creations instead of traditional artists' music, raises important questions about the future of music and the role of artificial intelligence in artistic creation. This behavioral shift can be seen as a reflection of the extreme personalization that technology offers, allowing users to access compositions that perfectly align with their personal tastes. However, it may also signal a devaluation of the work of musicians and songwriters who dedicate years of their lives to honing their craft.

In the Brazilian context, where music is a fundamental part of culture, this shift could have significant implications. The rise of platforms that use AI to generate music may affect the local music industry, which already faces challenges from piracy and competition from streaming services. If users begin to prefer their own AI-generated creations, it could lead to a decrease in consumption of music from Brazilian artists, negatively impacting the music scene and cultural diversity.

Moreover, this trend could spark a debate about originality and authenticity in music. AI-generated music raises questions about copyright and the intellectual property of the works produced. As more people turn to AI as their primary source of music, it will be crucial to observe how the music industry adapts to these new dynamics and how traditional artists respond to this competition.

Finally, it is important to monitor how this preference for AI-generated music evolves and becomes a norm. The interaction between technology and human creativity is a constantly changing field, and the way consumers engage with music may shape the future of the industry in ways we cannot yet predict. The discussion about the value of music and the listening experience may become increasingly complex as AI becomes a more dominant presence in music creation.

What this coverage includes

  • Clear source attribution and link to the original publication.
  • Editorial framing about relevance, impact, and likely next developments.
  • Review for readability, context, and duplication before publication.

Original source:

The Verge AI

About this article

This article was curated and published by AIDaily as part of our editorial coverage of artificial intelligence developments. The content is based on the original source cited below, enriched with editorial context and analysis. Automated tools may assist with translation and initial structuring, but publication decisions, factual review, and contextual framing remain editorial responsibilities.

Learn more about our editorial process