The dictionary sues OpenAI
Encyclopedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster say that OpenAI violated the copyright of almost 100,000 articles by using them for LLM training.
Encyclopedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster have filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging in its complaint that the AI giant has committed “massive copyright infringement.”
Britannica, which owns Merriam-Webster, retains the copyright to nearly 100,000 online articles, which have been scraped and used to train OpenAI’s LLMs without permission, the publisher alleges in the lawsuit.
Britannica also accuses OpenAI of violating copyright laws when it generates outputs that contain “full or partial verbatim reproductions” of its content and when the AI lab uses its articles in ChatGPT’s RAG ( retrieval augmented generation ) workflow. OpenAI’s RAG tool is how the LLM scans the web or other databases for newly updated information when responding to a query. Britannica also alleges that OpenAI violates the Lanham Act, a trademark statute, when it generates made-up hallucinations and attributes them falsely to the publisher.
“ChatGPT starves web publishers like [Britannica] of revenue by generating responses to users’ queries that substitute, and directly compete with, the content from publishers like [Britannica],” the lawsuit reads. Britannica also alleges ChatGPT’s hallucinations jeopardize “the public’s continued access to high-quality and trustworthy online information.”
Britannica joins a number of other publishers and writers in pursuing legal action against OpenAI over copyright issues. The New York Times , Ziff Davis (owner of Mashable, CNET, IGN, PC Mag, and others), and more than a dozen newspapers across the U.S. and Canada , including the Chicago Tribune, the Denver Post, the Sun Sentinel, the Toronto Star, and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, have sued OpenAI.
A similar Britannica lawsuit against Perplexity is still pending.
There is not a strong legal precedent that establishes whether using copyrighted content to train an LLM is copyright infringement. But in one particular instance , Anthropic successfully convinced federal judge William Alsup that this use case — using the content as training data — is transformative enough to be legal. However, Alsup argued that Anthropic violated the law by illegally downloading millions of books, rather than paying for them, which warranted a $1.5 billion class action settlement for impacted writers.
Disrupt 2026: The tech ecosystem, all in one room
Save up to $300 or 30% to TechCrunch Founder Summit
OpenAI did not respond to TechCrunch’s request for comment before publication.
Amanda Silberling is a senior writer at TechCrunch covering the intersection of technology and culture. She has also written for publications like Polygon, MTV, the Kenyon Review, NPR, and Business Insider. She is the co-host of Wow If True, a podcast about internet culture, with science fiction author Isabel J. Kim. Prior to joining TechCrunch, she worked as a grassroots organizer, museum educator, and film festival coordinator. She holds a B.A. in English from the University of Pennsylvania and served as a Princeton in Asia Fellow in Laos.
You can contact or verify outreach from Amanda by emailing amanda@techcrunch.com or via encrypted message at @amanda.100 on Signal.
Actively scaling? Fundraising? Planning your next launch? TechCrunch Founder Summit 2026 delivers tactical playbooks and direct access to 1,000+ founders and investors who are building, backing, and closing.
The billionaires made a promise — now some want out Connie Loizos
The billionaires made a promise — now some want out
The billionaires made a promise — now some want out
US Army announces contract with Anduril worth up to $20B Anthony Ha
US Army announces contract with Anduril worth up to $20B
US Army announces contract with Anduril worth up to $20B
Honda is killing its EVs — and any chance of competing in the future Tim De Chant
Honda is killing its EVs — and any chance of competing in the future
Honda is killing its EVs — and any chance of competing in the future
Meta reportedly considering layoffs that could affect 20% of the company Anthony Ha
Meta reportedly considering layoffs that could affect 20% of the company
Meta reportedly considering layoffs that could affect 20% of the company
‘Not built right the first time’ — Musk’s xAI is starting over again, again Tim Fernholz
‘Not built right the first time’ — Musk’s xAI is starting over again, again
‘Not built right the first time’ — Musk’s xAI is starting over again, again
Lovable says it added $100M in revenue last month alone, with just 146 employees Anna Heim
Lovable says it added $100M in revenue last month alone, with just 146 employees
Lovable says it added $100M in revenue last month alone, with just 146 employees
Meta acquired Moltbook, the AI agent social network that went viral because of fake posts Amanda Silberling
Meta acquired Moltbook, the AI agent social network that went viral because of fake posts
Meta acquired Moltbook, the AI agent social network that went viral because of fake posts
What this coverage includes
- Clear source attribution and link to the original publication.
- Editorial framing about relevance, impact, and likely next developments.
- Review for readability, context, and duplication before publication.
Original source:
TechCrunch AIAbout this article
This article was curated and published by AIDaily as part of our editorial coverage of artificial intelligence developments. The content is based on the original source cited below, enriched with editorial context and analysis. Automated tools may assist with translation and initial structuring, but publication decisions, factual review, and contextual framing remain editorial responsibilities.
Learn more about our editorial process