Inteligência Artificial

Apple sues OpenAI for allegedly stealing hardware secrets

Publicado porRedacao AIDaily
3 min de leitura
Autor na fonte original: Jay Peters

Apple has sued OpenAI, alleging that engineers stole Apple secrets to advance the AI startup's hardware plans. In its complaint, Apple says it uncovered "a pattern of theft of Apple's trade secrets by OpenAI employees who were formerly at Apple." In addition to OpenAI, the lawsuit also names IO Products - Jony Ive's hardware startup, […]

Compartilhar:

Apple alleges that it has uncovered a ‘pattern of theft’ from OpenAI employees who formerly worked at Apple.

Apple alleges that it has uncovered a ‘pattern of theft’ from OpenAI employees who formerly worked at Apple.

Apple has sued OpenAI, alleging that engineers stole Apple secrets to advance the AI startup’s hardware plans. In its complaint , Apple says it uncovered “a pattern of theft of Apple’s trade secrets by OpenAI employees who were formerly at Apple.” In addition to OpenAI, the lawsuit also names IO Products — Jony Ive’s hardware startup, which OpenAI bought in 2025 — along with two specific employees, Tang Tan (OpenAI’s chief hardware officer) and Chang Liu (who joined OpenAI from Apple in January).

An Apple spokesperson shared this statement with 9to5Mac :

At Apple, our teams are constantly developing breakthrough technologies to create the best products and services in the world, and protecting their work and intellectual property is something we take very seriously. Recently, significant evidence has emerged suggesting individuals employed by OpenAI wrongfully took Apple’s secret and confidential information regarding our unreleased technologies, processes, and products. We will always defend our teams’ hard work and innovations, and we are taking all appropriate steps to do so.

OpenAI’s Drew Pusateri tells The Verge that “We have no interest in other companies’ trade secrets. We remain focused on building innovative technology that empowers people everywhere.” Apple didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment from The Verge .

Liu is accused of accessing Apple’s systems after leaving the company and downloading information, including “dozens of Apple’s confidential hardware-related files, including voluminous, detailed information about unreleased products, engineering presentations, technical specifications, and proprietary project data.” He is also said to have instructed a former Apple colleague on how to copy confidential Apple files and “avoid trouble” with the company’s security team ahead of her joining OpenAI. Liu allegedly told her they should communicate over Line Messenger to avoid being detected.

“Mr. Liu’s material breaches of his contract are equally clear and deliberate: he accessed, copied, and directed the disclosure of Apple Confidential Information after his employment ended, in direct violation of his post-termination obligations,” Apple says.

“This is a systematic effort to acquire, retain, and use Apple’s trade secrets to help OpenAI”

Apple alleges that Tan has been “methodically using Apple’s confidential information to benefit OpenAI,” including emailing information to himself about Apple suppliers before leaving the company and asking for confidential Apple information when interviewing Apple employees for OpenAI jobs.

OpenAI has also told Apple staffers to bring things like “CAD/design artifacts” and “prototypes” to interviews, according to the suit. “This is a systematic effort to acquire, retain, and use Apple’s trade secrets to help OpenAI try to replicate the secret technologies, business processes, and supply chain innovations that took Apple decades to build in its consumer hardware business,” Apple says.

Apple alleges that OpenAI has also been “targeting Apple’s prized partner network and supply chain directly,” including having an Apple partner, which works with Apple on industrial design and metal-finishing techniques, “perform Apple’s proprietary, trade secret processes for OpenAI’s benefit.”

More than 400 former Apple staffers now work at OpenAI, Apple claims. The company accuses OpenAI of advising Apple staffers that are departing to let OpenAI know if Apple personnel “ask you to sign anything.”

Apple says it reached out to OpenAI in February to raise its concerns and ask OpenAI to say what it was doing to look into the problem. “OpenAI never responded,” according to Apple.

OpenAI’s first hardware product is expected to arrive next year. In the lawsuit, Apple casts doubt on OpenAI’s ability to ship — at least without relying on Apple’s work. “OpenAI’s nascent hardware business now rests on the shakiest of foundations,” the lawsuit says, “rotten to its core by its illegal reliance on misappropriated trade secrets.”

Update, July 10th : Added statement from OpenAI.

I spent a week using the Trump phone — it sucks

Polestar owners left ‘holding the bag’ after EV brand pulls out of the US

Xreal’s new AR glasses are way cheaper and almost just right

Netflix reportedly considers adding always-on channels

Pontos-chave

  • A ação da Apple destaca a importância da proteção de propriedade intelectual no setor de tecnologia.
  • O caso pode impactar a reputação da OpenAI e suas futuras parcerias.
  • A mobilidade de profissionais entre empresas exige medidas rigorosas de segurança e compliance.

Análise editorial

A ação judicial da Apple contra a OpenAI levanta questões significativas sobre a proteção de propriedade intelectual e a ética na transição de talentos entre empresas de tecnologia. No Brasil, onde o setor de tecnologia está em rápida expansão, essa situação pode servir como um alerta para startups e empresas estabelecidas sobre a importância de salvaguardar suas inovações e segredos comerciais. A crescente mobilidade de profissionais entre empresas, especialmente em áreas de alta competitividade como inteligência artificial e hardware, exige que as organizações implementem medidas rigorosas de segurança e compliance.

Além disso, o caso destaca a tensão crescente entre grandes empresas de tecnologia e startups inovadoras. A OpenAI, que se posiciona como um líder em IA, pode enfrentar desafios não apenas legais, mas também reputacionais. A percepção pública de que a empresa pode ter se beneficiado de práticas inadequadas pode impactar sua imagem e suas parcerias futuras, especialmente em um mercado onde a confiança é um ativo valioso.

Para o ecossistema de tecnologia brasileiro, essa disputa pode servir como um catalisador para discussões sobre a necessidade de legislações mais robustas em torno da propriedade intelectual e da proteção de dados. À medida que mais empresas brasileiras buscam inovação e colaboração internacional, a compreensão das implicações legais de tais colaborações se torna crucial. O que observar a seguir é como a OpenAI responderá a essas alegações e se isso influenciará a maneira como as empresas de tecnologia operam em um cenário global cada vez mais competitivo e regulado.

O que esta cobertura entrega

  • Atribuicao clara de fonte com link para a publicacao original.
  • Enquadramento editorial sobre relevancia, impacto e proximos desdobramentos.
  • Revisao de legibilidade, contexto e duplicacao antes da publicacao.

Fonte original:

The Verge AI

Sobre este artigo

Este artigo foi curado e publicado pelo AIDaily como parte da nossa cobertura editorial sobre desenvolvimentos em inteligência artificial. O conteúdo é baseado na fonte original citada abaixo, enriquecido com contexto e análise editorial. Ferramentas automatizadas podem auxiliar tradução e estruturação inicial, mas a decisão de publicar, a revisão factual e o enquadramento de contexto seguem responsabilidade editorial.

Saiba mais sobre nosso processo editorial